Entrepreneur’s Dilemma – Product or Service

by David Cummings on November 10, 2009

4093288620_8d78d794aa

One of the more important decisions entrepreneurs need to make is about the type of business they’re going to create. More specifically, they should ask themselves if it is going to be a product or service company, as well as whether they plan to focus their business strategy on one-off sales or recurring subscriptions. My background before starting an enterprise web content management software company (which has subsequently spawned a software-as-a-service marketing automation software company) was doing full-service web design and web application development as a solo entrepreneur.

After building websites and doing consulting services for several years in the late 1990s, I knew that I wanted to build a product-based company. Now, of course, choosing between a focus on products or services is a serious decision, with pros and cons for each approach. Let’s take a look at some of the factors that go into the decision making process.

Pros of Product Companies

  • Higher margins
  • Greater economies of scale
  • More appetite from investors

Pros of Service Companies

  • Less capital-intensive
  • Fewer moving parts
  • Potentially profitable from day one

Naturally, many of the cons for products are pros for services and vice versa. I’ve met with two different entrepreneurs in Atlanta over the past few months that have seen the recession seriously impact their services business. As a result, they are now actively working on adding a product component that is delivered over the web for a monthly fee. The goal is to smooth over inconsistent services revenue by adding a subscription revenue aspect to their business. Unfortunately, the grass isn’t always greener on the other side, due to how difficult it is to get a product off the ground and make it commercially successful.

My advice to entrepreneurs is to start with a hybrid approach from day one — do consulting while identifying product opportunities. The benefit of consulting is the ability to pay the bills and to take your time, on your own dime. The benefit of building a product is the long-term growth opportunities and scalability. One major caveat: Consciously prepare yourself and your company for the day that you have to dedicate people to one line of the business or the other. Continuing to have the same people straddle the fence between products and services is a recipe for failure. Good luck!

(Photo:  Sarah McD on Flickr)

Ed note:  Are railroads in the product or service business?

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon
  • TwitThis
  • Technorati
  • Reddit
  • MySpace
  • NewsVine
  • email
  • FriendFeed
  • Netvibes
  • Ping.fm
  • RSS
  • Slashdot
  • Yahoo! Bookmarks
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • PDF
  • HackerNews
  • Suggest to Techmeme via Twitter
  • I am in the process of making the jump myself. My startup(s) are slowly growing, and it's gotten to the point where I am quitting my day job to focus on them. However, since I still need the cash flow, I'm looking to pick up a part time contract to keep me afloat while I nurse my projects to profitability.

    Thanks for the encouragement!
  • I definitely didn't stress it enough that the consulting piece is only to pay the bills early on and should be abandoned with vigor once the product has any sort of traction. I agree that straddling the fence for too long will lead to failure.
  • dewde
    I really dug your 3-bulleted "Pros" list for each. That does an excellent job clarifying the advantages. Also, it is spot on accurate with what I've experienced in the web and software industries over the past 15 years.

    Good stuff man.

    peace | dewde
  • dewde
    I think this is an excellent idea for a very small segment of entrepreneurs. The hybrid approach can be done but the complexities inherent in trying to be excellent at two types of businesses will cancel out any perceived benefit. My recommendation is choose one type and do it with excellence. I know you didn't say this outright but my unspoken take-away from the article was, "Instead of doing one thing well, do 2 things average." For most of us, and by that I mean me, I have a hard enough time doing one thing well, let alone two. Give me two things and I can rarely pull off average.

    I invested in, and worked for, a non-bootstrapped startup that straddled the fence from the very beginning. Actually, they had a 3-way division. First, a service based group that provided software QA consulting, second a software reselling group that sold other people software, and third our group that was developing a product. The benefit was that a good bit of the overhead expenses were shared. All 3 groups used the same facilities, administrative staff, payroll, accounting, etc. But the temptation to straddle the fence and save money was too alluring and the decision was made for the software reselling group to be responsible for selling our in-house software.

    Seemed like an excellent decision to me.

    We had a terrific, and proven, sales team. By all means they should have been able to sell our product. But they didn't. My perception is that they weren't invested in selling our product, they were invested in making their numbers by selling what customers were asking for. And they weren't asking for our new and unknown product. If you were a sales person which product would you try and sell? The one where you have to educate the customer first? Or the one that customers already know, recognize the brand and manufacturer, and realize they need?

    Our product group was expensive. Truth be told, I believe it held the company back. It lasted 3 years and was sold off (not at a profit).

    Of course the other possibility is our software just sort of sucked a lot. Cough.

    Still though, I say narrow your focus, don't broaden it. Clarify your goals, don't dilute them. Be excellent at one thing, not marginal at two.

    peace | dewde
  • cignalguy
    Mr. Dewede (whom I follow on Twitter) makes a good point. You have heared it said " A man's gotta know his limitations" - Dirty Harry circa 1974. Wow! Some wisdom is timeless, even if it's from the 1970's.

    Here in lies the rub. I consider myself a very specialized type of enterprenure with a very specific kind of client base. I don't tread in markets that I don't know very well. However, diversification is an important business strategy for survival in these times. My strategy has been to diversify my service business in the market that I know best, my present clients. It is a value added proposition for my sales team. Then my risk of providing a product that "..sort of sucked" is still a risk, just a more manageable risk.

    Know yourself...know your customer... and you know your risk
  • dewde
    "Diversification is an important business strategy for survival"

    Agreed! I think this was at the heart of David's article. The key is to find just the right strike point, as you said, between risk, your customers, and your own limitations. Yes, yes. I agree :-).

    peace | dewde
  • Like the hybrid approach as well. Recently contemplating making the product/services choice. Key adviser said it was too early to force that decision. Get traction then make the call.
blog comments powered by Disqus

Older post:

Newer post: